Monday, July 19, 2010

Public Transportation Myth Busted

I found this article from Cato worth reading. Not a bad analog for those thinking that if the government takes over an industry (health care?) that costs will improve. Here's an excerpt for the time/link challenged:

This Cato briefing paper compared the costs of different forms of travel in 2006. Updating to 2008, auto owners spent about 22 cents a passenger mile driving, and subsidies to highways added another penny a passenger mile. Airfares averaged about 14 cents a passenger mile, and subsidies to airports added another penny. Amtrak fares averaged 30 cents a passenger mile, and subsidies brought the total to nearly 60 cents. Urban transit is about the most expensive form of travel in the United States, with fares averaging only about 21 cents a passenger mile but subsidies of 72 cents a passenger mile. This makes transit 4 times as expensive as driving.

In short, those who want to get people out of their cars and onto transit are trying to get people from an inexpensive, convenient, and increasingly energy-efficient form of travel to an expensive, inconvenient, and increasingly energy-wasteful form of travel.

2 comments:

egm said...

I'd like to know about external costs, particularly polution. Cars vs. trains, etc. As well as whether there are productivity add-ons for trains etc. (I could work on client work on a train, but usually can't in a car.) All that said, I don't like subsidies. I think they should let anybody run a bus line like they did in Peru. It was crazy, but if the bus didn't make money, then it wasn't headed down the street. And that was PERU! -Maxfield

Gayle said...

Since watching family members and friends, especially on the west side of town, try to use the mass transit we have in place and struggle to do so conveniently (lousy lag times) and reliable (sometimes no buss at all) and inexpensive I can tell you first hand...it does not work that well at all. And this is Salt Lake. How could we make it like Peru?
For some a car is out of the question.